Feed on
Posts
Comments

Another year, another Man Booker Prize for fiction and the longlist has been announced.

Now I’m not a particularly patriotic person but … Two Aussies on the list!! Go team! Three actually if you include Aravind Adiga’s, author of The White Tiger, who was educated in Australia and holds Australian nationality.

The Aussies are first-time author, Steve Toltz with A Fraction of the Whole and Michelle de Kretser’s The Lost Dog.

What I find interesting is that a few of the books aren’t even published yet: From A to X and The Northern Clemency. It seems strange to me. Imagine a Best Film Oscar being given to a film that was yet to be released. I would have thought these books would simply be in the running for the prize next year. I bet the publishers are scrambling like chooks on an iceberg to get those books into stores ASAP.

I briefly entertained the idea of reading all the books on the list but (a) I’d be living in fantasy land to attempt that feat at the moment given that I spend more time reading My first words to my son than I do reading novels. (b) As written about on this blog I’ve vowed to never read a book because of the author’s name or because it seems every other person on the planet has read it and raved about it.

And not all of the books on the list appeal to me anyway. Netherland, The Clothes on Their Backs, Child 44 and A Fraction of the Whole are the ones that immediately caught my eye. I think reading these four novels is an achievable goal.

Visit the Synopsis and author bio available on the Man Booker site.

And below are links to Amazon:

The shortlist will be announced on September 9 with the winner announced on October 14.

Have you read any of the novels from the list yet? Currently reading or plan to read?

If a Man would that his Writings have an Effect on the Generality of Readers, he had better imitate that Gentleman, who would use no Words in his Works that was not well understood by his Cook-maid.

I couldn’t have Said it better Myself. If only all writers followed the sage advice of Benjamin Franklin.

As I understand it, the purpose of writing is to be understood. So when words are used that most readers don’t understand – ie big words - the meaning is lessened. And the reader is most likely left annoyed and/or frustrated.

If there was an Olympic event for the number of ridiculously, incomprehensibly obscure words one can fit into a single paragraph it would have been won by the author of a non-fiction book I read a little while ago.

I have a fairly large vocabulary, I read widely, I love language and I love to learn new words but this book drove me crazy! Crazy I tell you!

Here’s just a sample: ostinato, psittacosis, paracosm, and (this one takes the cake) sententiousness! Even now, I don’t have the energy to look them up in the dictionary.

I just don’t get it. Why the big words? If writers are trying to impress their readers they may want to use another strategy. A study conducted by Princeton University revealed that readers perceive a writer’s use of big words not as a sign of intelligence but rather the opposite; the more big words used, the less intelligent, in the reader’s estimation, the writer becomes. The rationale being that only someone lacking intelligence would attempt to create an image of intelligence by using words that no one understands.* I love that! We readers aren’t as naïve and shallow as some writers think.

So why do some writers feel compelled to use big words? It apparently makes them come across as less intelligent than if they had used simple words and it impedes comprehension. Am I missing something here?

How do you feel about the use of ridiculously, incomprehensibly obscure words?

* Disclaimer: I’m certainly not suggesting that the author of the crazy-making book I read is not intelligent, of course not. It just begs the question why he feels the need to use words that most of his readers wouldn’t know the meaning of.

My husband and I are renovating our house and in doing so I will realise one of my lifelong dreams: to have my own library. An entire room dedicated to books and reading with custom-built (ie husband-built) shelving and a comfy armchair. Bliss.

Yet despite being more than happy to indulge my library dream, and the floor space, my husband just doesn’t get the whole library thing.

‘But you’ve already read these books, right?’
‘Yes.’
‘So why do you need a library?’
‘Ah, to keep the books in.’
‘So tell me again why you’re keeping books you’ve already read?’

I try to think of a logical answer to that very logical question and come up empty handed. So how about an emotional, non-sensical one:

‘Well, … because … they’re my books.’
‘Okaaaay, riiiight,’ he gives me a look that suggests he’s sizing me up for a strait jacket and backs away slowly.

Now, I’m not completely lacking in discrimination; I don’t keep every book - probably 80% or so.*

I really don’t know why I love owning books and looking at my books, resting in rows on a bookshelf with spines on show. It defies logic.

If you can articulate your love of books please share it here; … actually, even if it’s not particularly articulate that’s okay too.

* The books I turf are the ones I didn’t finish reading; books I’ve reviewed but wouldn’t choose for myself; and books that have been sitting in my unread pile for so long that they’ve actually claimed the land and built on it. The Joke by Milan Kundera, don’t think I didn’t notice that two-bedroom townhouse on my bedside table.

You know how there’s those things that, to you, seem perfectly reasonable and normal but to other people are just downright weird? Well, I think this might be one of those things.

I don’t buy thin novels. I only buy thick ones. Why? Because I think they’re better value for money and frankly, a more worthwhile investment of my time. (Gee, I sound like one of those people who have a share portfolio. )

Now I know that value shouldn’t be measured by number of pages but I really just can’t help it. It’s a psychological thing, minus the ‘logical’.

And I figure that if I go to the trouble of getting to know a novel’s characters and getting used to the writing style then I may as well spend some time with it. If it’s all over in 150 pages then it’s not worth the intellectual and emotional investment I’ve made. It’s for this reason that I’ve never taken to short stories. They’re just too … too … short.

There’s no doubt that I’m missing out on some great reads because of my prejudice against size-challenged stories.

Am I being ridiculous? … On second thought, don’t answer that. Do you have any quirky rules or habits when it comes to books?

I became a fan of Pinky McKay after reading her down-to-earth articles on bellybelly.com.au whilst I was pregnant with my son so I was pleased to see her new book Toddler Tactics: How to make magic from mayhem had been released. Its timing could not have been better as my son had recently celebrated his first birthday and graduated from baby to toddler.

Pinky McKay is a lactation consultant, infant massage iToddler Tactics by Pinky McKay nstructor, author and columnist specialising in parenting and baby care. Her books include Parenting By Heart and Sleeping Like a Baby.

Toddler Tactics is an easy and reasonably quick read; I finished it in a few hours. However, for a small book it’s incredible how much useful information it contains. Topics include toddlers’ physical development, behaviour, play, learning and sleeping, to name but a few.

It’s the kind of book that can also be used as a reference to be consulted later as your child grows and new challenges arise. For example, I’ll be revisiting the chapter on toilet training in a year or two.

McKay has a gentle approach to parenting. Her advice doesn’t come with a ‘Do it this way or your child will be forever ruined’ footnote. She doesn’t aim to add to the pressure already on parents who are often already feeling guilty or inadequate for one reason or another. Rather she provides answers to a lot of the questions many parents will have about their toddlers with a guiding hand and some common sense advice. For instance, tips for encouraging healthy eating include: don’t put too much food on your child’s plate, and let your toddler help prepare food and some things parents can do to support their toddler’s speech include: name everything, listen, exaggerate speech sounds

Toddler Tactics is peppered with first-hand accounts from parents of toddlers sharing their experiences and their own toddler tactics which are often quite touching and very helpful in themselves.

McKay does have some parenting do’s and don’ts however they are do’s and don’ts that I don’t think any conscientious parent could disagree with. For example: don’t label children, use rewards rather than bribery, support don’t criticise. Even though these are all common sense principles, as a parent, it helps to be reminded sometimes.

Whilst there is a lot of useful advice and information in this book I think the most important thing I learnt from it is to always try looking at things from my child’s perspective. For instance, McKay gives parents a reality check with regards sharing:

Do you lend your friend your car, your computer or your brand-new shoes? Isn’t it a bit unrealistic to expect your toddler to willingly part with his favourite toys whenever a strange child visits? (p93)

Point taken. And she reminds parents that very young children are simply not able to understand the concept of sharing, this capacity doesn’t develop until about three years of age. So in other words, ‘Lighten up Mum and Dad!’

And McKay has this advice for playtime:

Give children a few minutes’ warning that it’s nearly time to stop playing, rather than insisting they pack up now! Imagine how you would feel if you were busily working at a task and somebody ordered you to stop immediately! (p119)

Toddler Tactics is a must-read for all parents, and soon-to-be parents, of toddlers.

Publisher: Penguin Australia

RRP: $24.95

Older Posts »